Questions I have been asked since my
study visit to learn about the Lifestyle Redesign® occupational therapy
approach. I wanted to investigate how it could be used to improve the
hospital/home interface for older people.
Q- So what is the difference between Lifestyle Redesign®
and Occupational Therapy?
A- I heard several different OTs, lecturers, researchers
and clinicians give their view on this during my visit- “Lifestyle Redesign® is occupational therapy!”
Q- Why the trademark?
A- The Division of Occupational Science and Occupational
Therapy at University of Southern California (USC) developed the approach. Only
OTs who have completed certification at USC can use interventions called
Lifestyle Redesign®. The Division wanted to protect the quality of any research
(and therefore evidence base) that used an approach calling itself Lifestyle
Redesign®. The methodology has been widely publicised and use of it its
welcomed, however programmes need to be entitled something different e.g. the Lifestyle
Matters programme developed in the UK (Craig & Mountain 2007- see books tab
at top of page).
Q- But how are things like weight management groups
relevant to OTs working in hospital settings? Most OTs don’t work in that sort
of way?
A- While I was on my study visit I experienced the
approach being used in many different settings and with many very different
client groups. This demonstrates it’s versatility and adaptability to many
different areas of work. Lifestyle Redesign® is a conceptual approach that can
be used to develop programmes for individuals or groups, but it is not an
instruction manual. There are complex issues to be understood and incorporated
into interventions.
The
approach takes an occupational view of individuals functioning and emphasises
the health promoting aspect of redesigning an individuals occupations in a way
that is meaningful for them.
Preventative work is an area where OT has a lot to offer (see my P post yesterday) and is a key area of current UK health care policy.
Q- But we haven’t got time to do this sort of thing!
A- This approach provides a person centred, evidence
based, health promoting approach using core OT skills. If used with older
people at the hospital/home interface, it has the potential to improve outcomes
and reduce readmission rates, thereby reducing costs. Changing practice is
always difficult, especially in fast moving acute services, but we need to
consider the old question of whether we are ‘doing the job right- or doing the
right job’!
The redesign idea makes a lot of sense, but will probably encounter opposition based on the modern trend towards short-term micro savings resulting in (ignored) long-term macro losses.
ReplyDelete